ARAMANY CLASSIFICATION PDF

Malalkis Acquired postsurgical maxillary defects, Aramany classification. He divided the defects into 6 categories based upon the relationship of the defect with the abutment teeth. Hence there is an utmost need of a comprehensive classification system for maxillectomy defects, which takes into account the multitude of factors necessary to rehabilitate such patients and which has been critically evaluated by the managing multidisciplinary team to reach a consensus. The class VI defect is a rare surgical creation. L- Lateral defects excluding the condyle.

Author:Domuro Mikahn
Country:Great Britain
Language:English (Spanish)
Genre:Health and Food
Published (Last):24 March 2010
Pages:301
PDF File Size:16.28 Mb
ePub File Size:13.11 Mb
ISBN:554-1-33910-673-7
Downloads:45738
Price:Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader:Kazratilar



Vudozragore Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. The amount of closure can be depicted by varying the length of the line to be drawn.

A classification system of defects. A favorable defect must be classificationn at the time of tumor removal to provide proper support and sufficient retention and stability of the obturator for the prosthesis to function adequately.

The amount of protrusion can be depicted by varying the length of the line. Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses. Cantor and Curtis Classification of Mandibular Defects9: Obturators for the restoration of maxillary defects should restore mastication, speech, deglutition, facial contours, and dental appearance.

Labial stabilization and the use of splinting, especially of the terminal abutments, are desirable. Liverpool Classification of Maxillectomy Defects5: Such kind of ablative surgeries gives rise to a wide range of maxillofacial defects; such defects are called as acquired defects of the maxillofacial region. To accomplish this for partially edentulous patients, c,assification the clinicians must provide comprehensive treatment planning and sound physiological design principles for a removable partial denture RPD.

Their classification is as follows- clasxification. The classification is as follows- C- Central defects of mandible from canine to canine.

Class II includes arches in which the premaxilla and the premaxillary dentition on the contralateral side is maintained. Such defects lead to functional deficits and enormous psychological strain and require rehabilitation classificwtion all ages.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; Preincisive foramen clefts clefts lying anterior to the incisive foramen. C- Defects involve central segment containing 4 incisors and 2 canines. J Classifocation Oncol ; The modified classification had several advantages over the original classification, i. Here we have Maxillofacial Defects, Craniofacial tried to compile all the classifications that exist for both congenital and Defects, Cleft, Acquired Anomalies.

Clinical conditions also dictate that the definitive treatment plan and RPD design be practical, affordable, and capable of meeting the functional needs and demands of the patient.

A classification system and algorithm classificatiob reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects. Plastic Reconstr Surg ; Prosthetic rehabilitation of maxillectomy defects is effective, and surgical reconstruction is usually not indicated. Support Center Support Center. Their proposed classification is as follows: June maxillofacial prosthodontist in reconstruction and rehabilitation phase.

J Prosthet Dent These aramamy also experience problems such as seepage of nasal secretions into the oral cavity, poor lip seal, xerostomia, exophthalmoses and diplopia. In the present study, Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common oral cancer followed classifictaion ameloblastoma, Table I showed summery of surgical and prosthodontic management of study sample. Use of an interim obturator for definitive prosthesis fabrication. Presurgical planning by the prosthodontist and surgeon is essential.

Moreover, the patient develops aesthetical and psychological problems. There are often a few remaining posterior teeth located in a relatively straight line, calssification a unilateral linear design problem where leverage cannot be used to an effective degree. An osseo-facio-cutaneous RFFF can be used to reconstruct anterior maxilla, which will also provide good lip support. The classification is as follows- C— Condyle. Memon MR, Ghani F. Class IV situations involve the surgical removal of the entire premaxillae, leaving a bilateral defect anteriorly and a lateral defect posteriorly.

Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with clasisfication obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: There are around 14 different classification schemes for maxillectomy defects.

Unilateral maxillary defect class I was most commonly found and class VI defect was least commonly seen in study sample. Remember me on this computer.

He divided the defects into 6 categories based upon the relationship of the defect with the abutment teeth. Patients with complete maxillectomy were excluded from the arqmany. TOP Related Posts.

BIBBY COUPLING CATALOGUE PDF

ARAMANY CLASSIFICATION PDF

Vogis Hence there is an utmost need of a comprehensive classification system for maxillectomy defects, which takes into account the multitude of factors necessary to rehabilitate such patients and which has been critically evaluated by the managing multidisciplinary team to reach a consensus. Reconstruction of maxillectomy and midfacial defects with free tissue transfer. There are around 14 different classification schemes for maxillectomy defects. The two arrows adjacent on either sides of the hard palate represent displacement of the palate.

IHI CCH1000 PDF

Pradeep Kumar, Room No. E-mail: moc. Yadav P. There are around 14 different classification schemes for maxillectomy defects. Before the advent and use of osseointegrated implants for dental rehabilitation, removable prosthetic rehabilitation with obturator was the only treatment option available for maxillectomy patients. However, placement either primary or secondary of osseointegrated implants in the maxilla that has been reconstructed with bone grafts has revolutionised the treatment and rehabilitation of such patients, thereby improving their quality of life. Hence there is an utmost need of a comprehensive classification system for maxillectomy defects, which takes into account the multitude of factors necessary to rehabilitate such patients and which has been critically evaluated by the managing multidisciplinary team to reach a consensus.

ELOGIO DE LA IRRELIGION PDF

Vudozragore Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. The amount of closure can be depicted by varying the length of the line to be drawn. A classification system of defects. A favorable defect must be classificationn at the time of tumor removal to provide proper support and sufficient retention and stability of the obturator for the prosthesis to function adequately.

Related Articles